Complete VGS Platform Q&A

Copy trading, also known as Copy Trading, is an investment method that allows investors to automatically replicate the actions of professional traders through a platform, thereby synchronizing buy and sell orders in their own accounts. This model enables beginners to trade without deeply studying the market by leveraging the experience of seasoned traders.

How it works:

• Automatic replication mechanism: When a trader opens or closes a position, the system synchronizes the same action in the follower's account proportionally.
• Two roles: Providers (professional traders) and followers (investors).
• Process: Followers subscribe to a provider's strategy → trades are automatically copied into their accounts.
• Position sizing: Copied positions are adjusted according to the capital ratio between the two parties, not by duplicating the exact trade volume.

Advantages:

• Reduces learning costs and saves time
• Beginners don't need to spend extensive effort studying the market
• Follow successful traders while gaining practical experience through observation

Overall, copy trading is an investment method of "leveraging others' strength," particularly suitable for beginners, investors with limited time to study the market, and those focused on long-term wealth growth.

In today's highly complex and information-dense investment market, achieving consistent and satisfactory investment returns has become increasingly difficult.

Challenges with Personal Investment:

• Value judgment difficulty: Determining whether a company's stock truly has investment value is extremely challenging
• Capital liquidity limitations: Long-term holding often means limited capital liquidity (2-3 years or longer)
• High requirements for short-term trading:
  • Strong market awareness and understanding
  • Continuous tracking of companies' fundamentals, technical indicators, and market sentiment
  • Ability to filter false, outdated, or misleading information
• Time and capability constraints: Most investors lack sufficient time and ability to maintain high-intensity professional analysis

VGS Advantages:

VGS is a cross-border online platform focused on artificial intelligence-driven investing, collaborating with the research team led by Professor Nguyễn Hữu An to develop and apply the advanced Delta Mind 5.0 system.

Delta Mind 5.0 capabilities:

• Automatically integrates and analyzes massive volumes of market data
• Filters out noise and invalid information
• Selects stocks with a higher probability of short-term price appreciation based on fundamentals, technical indicators, and market behavior

Dual screening mechanism:

• AI system preliminary screening
• Professional investment team secondary screening to optimize risk, timing, and structural factors

Through this "AI preliminary screening + professional team secondary screening" dual mechanism, the overall final selection win rate has remained consistently above 90%.

VGS supports cryptocurrency payments not to chase trends, but based on comprehensive considerations of efficiency, security, global operations, and capital management.

1. Efficiency Advantages vs Traditional Banking:

Traditional Banking	Cryptocurrency Payments
Complex international transfer procedures	Near-instant settlement
Long final settlement times (1-5 business days)	No dependence on banking hours
High fees + additional intermediary bank charges	Lower costs and simplified processes
Foreign exchange and cross-border restrictions	Significantly higher cross-border transfer efficiency

2. Security and Transparency Advantages:

• Publicly accessible and immutable transaction records
• On-chain verification for every transfer
• Avoids delays or opacity caused by manual processes in traditional systems

3. Professional Usage, Not Speculation:

• Cryptocurrency is used solely as a settlement and payment tool
• Does not encourage members to engage in high-frequency or speculative digital asset trading
• Functions as a "digital cross-border settlement channel"

4. Alignment with Global Strategy:

• Better serves global members
• Reserves technical flexibility for future cross-market operations
• Builds a more flexible and efficient capital settlement system

VGS uses cryptocurrency payments for efficiency, security, and global operations. It is a tool, not an objective; a technological choice, not a risk preference.

Important: In any form of investment, "absolute zero risk" does not exist. VGS does not and cannot promise capital preservation or guaranteed returns. However, through multiple mechanisms and structural design, the company maximizes capital security and controllability.

1. Risk Control is the Core - No Blind Capital Allocation

• Does not invest all funds into the market at once
• Implements strict capital layering and proportional management:
  • Only a portion of funds is used for actual trading
  • Remaining funds serve as risk buffers and emergency reserves
• Prevents a single incorrect judgment from causing major damage to total capital

2. AI Systems + Professional Teams Reduce Human Error

• AI stock selection system: Based on massive historical data and real-time market information, avoids emotional trading and subjective personal judgments
• Secondary screening by professional investment teams: Verifies AI outputs in terms of risk, structure, and timing, filters out assets that don't align with current market conditions
• Significantly reduces systemic risks arising from single-point decision errors

3. No Profit, No Fees - Aligned Interests

• Fees are charged only when profits are generated
• No fees are charged in the event of losses
• Company's interests are directly aligned with members' interests
• No incentive to pursue frequent trading or high-risk strategies for fee generation

4. Clear, Verifiable, and Traceable Fund Flows

• Trading and settlement records are traceable
• Fund inflows and outflows are clearly recorded
• Withdrawal actions are based on actual credited results, not verbal promises

5. Risk Control Takes Priority Over Scale Expansion

• Limiting the maximum investable amount per individual member
• Controlling fund concentration through membership tiers
• Avoiding amplified risk caused by overly rapid expansion

6. Correct Understanding of "Guarantee"

Guarantee ≠ No risk
Guarantee = Clear mechanisms, defined risk control logic, and verifiable results

What VGS provides:

• Structured risk control
• A sustainable investment model
• An operational approach aligned with member interests

VGS cannot eliminate market risk, but through systems, technology, and risk management, it keeps risk within acceptable boundaries. True protection lies not in promises, but in long-term stable operation.

This question reflects a high level of concern for capital security and deserves full respect. The core reason does not lie in any compliance issue, but rather in misunderstandings regarding regulatory jurisdiction, business boundaries, and VGS's legal positioning.

I. VGS Has Clear U.S. Regulatory Authority

Vietnam Global Securities Fund Inc (VGS) is a global securities technology and AI trading platform registered and operated in the United States. Its business strictly follows U.S. federal law and is continuously regulated by:

• The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
• The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)

The company also complies with relevant Colorado state regulations, including but not limited to:

• Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 11, Article 51 -- Colorado Securities Act
• Code of Colorado Regulations (CCR)

II. Why VGS Does Not Need Vietnamese Securities Regulatory Approval

1. VGS Is Not a Regulated Entity Under Vietnamese Securities Law

Under Vietnamese law, only the following entities must obtain approval from the State Securities Commission (SSC):

• Securities exchanges operating within Vietnam (e.g., HOSE, HNX)
• Vietnamese securities companies (e.g., SSI, VPS)
• Vietnamese fund management companies (e.g., VinaCapital, Dragon Capital)

VGS does not operate a securities exchange in Vietnam, nor does it conduct business as a Vietnamese securities or fund management company. Therefore, it does not fall under the scope of Vietnamese securities regulation.

2. "Having Vietnamese Users" ≠ "Being Subject to Vietnamese Financial Regulation"

This distinction is essential in international financial regulation. An investor's nationality or place of residence does not determine which country's financial regulation a platform must follow.

Regulatory determination is based on:

• Place of company registration
• Location of business operations
• Where trading and settlement are executed

Example: Vietnamese investors using platforms such as eToro or Interactive Brokers to access overseas markets are subject to regulation in the platforms' jurisdictions (e.g., the U.S. or Europe), not Vietnam. VGS's legal nature is consistent with these international platforms.

3. VGS Does Not Execute Trades "On Behalf of Clients" in Vietnam

• VGS does not execute trades for clients within Vietnam
• It does not provide local Vietnamese securities services
• It does not operate as a Vietnamese financial institution engaging in brokerage or asset management

Users replicate AI-driven strategies executed in U.S. and international markets. As such, VGS does not meet the legal conditions requiring Vietnamese securities licensing.

First, it must be understood: Building teams ≠ a pyramid scheme. Whether a structure is a pyramid depends on where money comes from, where value is created, and who bears the risk.

What Constitutes a True Pyramid Scheme?

A model is considered a pyramid scheme only if it simultaneously exhibits all three of the following characteristics:

1. Income primarily comes from recruiting new participants
2. No profit can be made without recruiting
3. Profits are derived from funds contributed by downstream participants, with no real value creation

The essence of a pyramid scheme is using money from later participants to pay earlier ones.

VGS vs. Pyramid Schemes - Direct Comparison

Dimension	Pyramid Scheme	VGS
Source of income	Funds contributed by downstream participants	✓ Real market investment returns
Can profits be made without recruiting?	❌ No	✓ Yes
Can withdrawals be made without recruiting?	❌ Restricted or delayed	✓ Normal withdrawals
Encourages unlimited additional investment?	✓ Yes	❌ Investment caps / VIP limits
Charges fees only when profitable?	❌ Various mandatory fees	✓ Commission charged only on profits
Risk control mechanisms	❌ None	✓ 40% position cap / risk control model
Verifiable investments	❌ Vague	✓ Trades and records available
Role of teams	Extraction tool	Risk diversification + market expansion

Key Difference:

• Pyramid schemes: Money comes from downstream participants
• VGS: Money comes from the market

Withdrawal Practices Comparison:

Feature	Pyramid Scheme	VGS
Continuous investment pressure	✓ Continuous pressure to add more capital	❌ Emphasizes limits on excessive investment
Withdrawal process	❌ Delaying or refusing withdrawals under pretexts	✓ Withdrawal T+1, credited on time
Fund flow direction	❌ Funds only flow in, never out	✓ Allows funds to be withdrawn at any time

Why Does VGS Build Teams?

Teams are not a source of profit. The purpose is to support:

• Customer acquisition
• Scale expansion
• Cost control
• Risk diversification
• Trust transmission

Business Terminology Behind "Recruiting People":

Common Expression	Business Term
Recruiting people	Customer acquisition
Developing downlines	Channel expansion
Building teams	Organizational scaling / agency systems
Recommending friends	Referrals
Team income	Channel incentives / revenue sharing

How Teams Address Key Issues:

• Trust transfer: Existing members recommend to new participants
• Cost reduction: Avoids advertising costs by rewarding referrers directly
• Risk diversification: Larger pooled participation enables diversification and hedging

Risk Diversification Example:

An investment of 10 billion VND:

• With 1 person: 100% risk borne by one individual (often unbearable)
• With 100,000 people: 100,000 VND per person (losses are shared, acceptable, minimal individual impact)

The core purpose of encouraging team participation within VGS is to expand the participation base and disperse individual investors' risk exposure. As the number of participants increases, each member's capital pressure and risk naturally decrease, making the overall investment process more stable and orderly.

Under centralized management and execution, investment decisions, position building, and position closing are carried out collectively by the company. Within this framework, the platform chooses to disclose specific stock codes after the transaction is completed rather than before it begins.

This decision is based on comprehensive considerations of market rules, risk control, and trading fairness, not on intentional information concealment.

Main Reasons for Post-Trade Disclosure:

1. To Prevent Market Interference

• When unified investments involve a certain scale of capital, early disclosure of trading targets may trigger:
• Copy trading
• Front-running
• Counter-trading
• These actions can lead to abnormal price fluctuations
• Affect execution prices and overall results
• Pre-trade confidentiality protects both capital and strategy

2. To Ensure Unified Execution

• Unified investment relies on synchronized pacing and discipline
• Early disclosure could prompt individual members to trade independently
• This disrupts position-building and closing plans
• Weakens overall strategy effectiveness

3. To Reduce Emotional Interference

• Disclosing stock codes before trades are completed can lead to:
• Excessive focus on short-term price movements
• Increased irrational emotions
• Undermined trust in professional decision-making

By disclosing stock codes after transactions are completed, transparency is achieved without affecting trading outcomes. Therefore, within a unified investment framework, post-trade disclosure of stock codes represents a professional system design that balances risk control, trading efficiency, and result transparency.

Within the VGS investment framework, full-position buying is not adopted. Instead, investment management is conducted through clearly defined position limits. This approach is not intended to reduce returns, but is rooted in professional risk control and long-term sustainability.

1. Full-Position Allocation Amplifies Uncontrollable Risk

• Financial markets are inherently uncertain
• Even with high win rates, no strategy can guarantee that every trade is correct
• If misjudgment or unexpected market events occur, full-position operations can lead to:
• Unbearable drawdowns
• Loss of ability to continue participating in the market
• The essence of position limits is to prevent a single mistake from determining survival.

2. Position Limits Are Basic Institutional Risk Management

• In professional investment institutions, private equity funds, and hedge funds:
• Long-term full-position strategies are almost nonexistent
• Phased position building, position control, and capital reserves are standard
• VGS's position management logic aligns with mature institutional practices

3. Capital Reserves Allow Response to Better Opportunities

• Market opportunities do not appear only once
• Retaining capital allows:
• Adjustments at more favorable price levels
• Corrections of positions
• New positioning opportunities
• With full allocation, short-term adverse movements eliminate room for adjustment

4. Position Limits Protect Long-Term Returns

• Full-position strategies: Pursue extreme short-term returns while bearing extreme risk
• Position management: Seeks stable and sustainable growth under controlled risk
• Position management aligns with the risk tolerance of most participants

5. Rejection of High-Risk Inducement

• High-risk schemes often encourage:
• Heavy positions
• Continuous increases
• "Doubling in one move" mentality
• Platforms that truly value risk management instead limit investment size
• Prevents participants from assuming excessive risk due to emotion or greed

VGS limits positions not because it lacks confidence in the market, but because it respects market uncertainty. Full allocation focuses on one result, while position management focuses on long-term survival and stable growth.

1. Capital Limitations of Independent Investment

• If the company invested independently, all risk and return would be concentrated within the company itself
• Any misjudgment or sudden market volatility would require the company alone to absorb the loss
• Results in extremely high risk concentration
• Undermines long-term operational stability

2. The Core of Collective Investment Is Risk Diversification

• By leading collective investment, VGS:
• Disperses capital and risk across multiple participants
• Distributes the risk of a single decision across a broader base
• Prevents one misjudgment from becoming fatal to a single entity
• Such risk dispersion mechanisms are fundamental in financial institutions
• Enhances overall resilience and stability

3. Profit-Based Commissions Protect Investor Interests

• VGS adopts a model where:
• Commissions are charged only after actual profits are generated
• No fees are charged in the absence of profit
• Under this structure, the company:
• Cannot profit from fixed fees or headcount-based income
• Can only earn through real investment results
• Aligns the company's interests with those of participants
• Encourages focus on risk control and long-term stability

4. Scale Effects and Risk Management Capability

• Through collective investment, VGS can:
• Form a reasonable capital scale while maintaining risk dispersion
• Enable more effective position management
• Implement phased entry and risk correction strategies
• This does not lead to full allocation or high-risk operations
• Position limits and risk control rules ensure no single market fluctuation causes unacceptable impact

5. A Long-Term Sustainable Investment Structure

• Independent investment: Concentrated risk and limited scale
• Collective investment: Combined with risk dispersion and profit-based commissions
• Achieves:
• Controllable risk
• Aligned interests
• Long-term stability

VGS adopts this model to ensure that the investment framework remains sustainable without sacrificing safety.

In the investment field, negative information appearing online is not uncommon. Some of it is not based on facts but arises from emotions, positions, or conflicts of interest.

Sources of Negative Information:

1. Former Partners/Employees

• After cooperation ends, some individuals may publish:
• Subjective or exaggerated statements
• Content driven by emotional fluctuations
• Statements based on cognitive bias or personal loss of interest

2. Competitive Behavior

• In a highly competitive investment market, it is not uncommon for:
• Competitors to discredit other platforms
• Information to be taken out of context
• Unverified claims to be spread

Characteristics of Such Content:

• Often lacks full background and verifiable evidence
• Reflects motives and positions rather than objective reality
• May be intentionally misleading or incomplete

How to Evaluate Platform Risk:

Should not rely on scattered online accusations, but should return to verifiable core facts:

• Fund operations: Can funds be deposited and withdrawn normally?
• Rule clarity: Are rules clear and consistently applied?
• Fee transparency: Are there mandatory actions or hidden fees?
• Risk control: Do clear risk control mechanisms exist?
• Track record: What is the long-term performance history?

Compared to negative statements of unclear origin and motivation, long-term verifiable systems and execution results provide far greater reference value.

Many people remain highly cautious toward any investment platform because they have previously experienced scams. This attitude is completely understandable and deserves respect. Rational skepticism itself is a responsible approach to capital.

How to Address This Concern:

1. Start With Company Background

• VGS (Vietnam Global Securities Fund Inc) was established in the United States
• Has obtained authorization under U.S. national-level financial regulatory systems
• Holds one of the most credible compliance frameworks in the global securities industry related to the SEC

2. Technical Credibility

• Core AI architecture: Led by strategic partner Professor Nguyễn Hữu An, founder of Học Viện Lạc Hồng
• Delta Mind 5.0 quantitative system: Development began in 2019
• Professor Nguyễn's experience:
• 32 years of stock market investment experience (1992-2025)
• 8 years of technology investment and R&D experience (2018-2025)
• Long focused on value discovery in artificial intelligence
• Proposed dual decision-making model based on "practice plus data"

3. Operational Philosophy

• VGS does not emphasize:
• High returns or rapid wealth accumulation
• Aggressive marketing of unrealistic gains
• VGS does focus on:
• Systems and processes
• Risk control above all else
• Sustainable, long-term growth

4. Investment Logic

• Conduct preliminary screening across global markets through AI systems
• Secondary confirmation by professional investment teams
• Execute trades in a unified manner
• Minimize individual judgment errors and emotional interference

5. Capital Management Approach

• Clearly opposes full-position operations
• Uses only part of the funds for market participation
• Reserves remainder as risk buffer
• Addresses uncertain market conditions with proper capital allocation
• Consistent with professional institutional risk management logic

6. Fee Structure Alignment

• Charges commissions only when actual profits are generated
• No fees charged in the absence of profit
• Does not sustain operations through:
• Long-term fund lockups
• Withdrawal restrictions
• Emphasizes transparency and capital autonomy

7. Red Flags to Watch For

During participation, observe whether these issues occur:

• ❌ Exaggerated returns promised
• ❌ Forced position increases
• ❌ Withdrawal restrictions
• ❌ Frequent rule changes

These are important references for judging platform health.

Final Perspective:

Good investment never begins with returns, but with clear rules, rational mechanisms, and controllable risk. Of course, this does not constitute a promise of any outcome, nor does it mean that VGS is suitable for everyone. Choosing to continue learning, remain observant, or even not participate at all are all entirely rational decisions deserving full respect.